Blogs > In The Room with Anthony SanFilippo

Daily Times beat writer Anthony J. SanFilippo takes you inside the locker rooms of the Philadelphia Flyers and the rest of the NHL.

Monday, November 1, 2010


Danny Briere was none to pleased with his 3-game suspension. Here is a transcript of his interview (one in which he ended it, then called the reporters back over because he had more to say).

Flyers center Danny Briere

Q: Where you surprised by the decision of the league?

"More shocked. I think surprised is not strong enough. Honestly, I'm shocked. I honestly didn't think I would get more than, after everything else, all of the suspensions that have been handed out the last couple of years and this year, honestly, I didn't think I was going to get a game. Then I thought, ok yes I am a repeat offender, they'll probably give me a game because of it. I'm shocked that it was more than a game."

Q: When you look at it, Danny, do you think you got 3 games because the third game was against the Islanders again?

"I mean it's possible. But, what am I going to do? Am I going to fight their whole team? I've had, what, 2 or 3 fights in my life, in my career. It's not like I'm going to do anything physical, even if I play against the Islanders, if that's what they were thinking. I don't know; it's possible."

Q: Is it fair to say that the new head shot rule is factoring it? They are making examples of everybody right away.

"Yeah. I made a mistake, my stick was up. I'm the first one to admit it. It shouldn't have been there. After what he said on the faceoff, all I was thinking was I got to protect myself, after what happened to [Andrej] Meszaros, what happened with Trevor Gilles on [Braydon] Coburn. I said, 'I got to protect myself', and if you see the faceoff before, he gets me in a headlock and punches me behind the head, the same player. So I was like I got to get my head up and protect myself. What I'm disappointed in is the fact they tried to spin it as a crosscheck to the head. If you look at the replay, it's clearly not a crosscheck. A crosscheck is two hands moving forward. It's a push with one hand. The mistake I made was that my stick was up there. Is it worth 3 games for that? I don't think so. On top of it, I missed him, I didn't even get him. There are guys whose careers are in danger for bad hits to the head. [Chicago Blackhawks' defensemen Niklas] Hjalmarsson gets two games, and we don't even know what is going to happen to [Buffalo Sabres' winger Jason] Pominville. Only 2 games for that. And then you have [Pittsburgh forward Matt] Cooke on [Boston Bruins' center Marc] Savard. Savard has already lost a big amount of time. That's why I was shocked that it was more than a game.

Q: The replay looks like your stick hits him in the helmet, but you are saying it never got to his helmet?

"I think my glove grazes the top of his helmet, not my stick. He goes down because Danny Carcillo comes in and finishes his check on the faceoff. So, I understand that that made it look worse; on the play everybody thought it was me. But if you look at the replay, it's my glove that kind of grazes over his helmet. My stick doesn't touch him.

Q: Is the old hearing system still in place? Did you get a chance to talk to [NHL Executive Colin] Campbell about this?

"I did. I explained the situation. I explained that he challenged me, and that I wanted to defend myself, protect myself. I told him that I understood that my stick should've been up there. But honestly, I don't think that. [the explanation] didn't amount to anything. I think his mind was made up before he rang, because anything I said was, obviously, not taken into consideration."

Q: You said [Frans] Nielsen was cursing at you. Was it that faceoff or a previous one?

"That one."

Q: What did he say?

"That's stuff on the ice, between two players."

Q: Did he say something threatening?

"Yeah. It was some sort of challenge, and that's why I had my stick up. I wanted to protect myself."

Q: Did it end with [Campbell hanging up on you]?

"Yeah pretty much."

Q: Are you disappointed with the timing of this, considering the team is on a three game roll?

"Well it's never a good time for a suspension. If you are losing, you don't want to be suspended; you want to try and get back on track and help the team. If the team is winning, you want to keep on a roll. There is never a good time for a suspension. Either way I would be disappointed."

Q: Can you talk about your aggression?

"He punched me behind the head, and if you look at the replay I'm shocked that Nielsen is doing that. I don't retaliate. On that faceoff, one thing you can write, that I told him, 'what are you doing? I know you are frustrated but what are you trying to prove out there?' That's when he crossed the circle, and gets in my face to tell me that stuff. Even at that point, there's clearly no anger. All I'm thinking of is to protect myself. After the play, if I wanted to hurt him, I could have jumped on him, I could have punched him in the back of the head, I could have crossed checked him in the back when he's down. Then, [Islanders' goalie Rick] DiPietro comes in and spears me, and even then there's no anger, no frustration, and that's why I was a little baffled by the whole thing. Because a lot of time, they will tell you its premeditated or you clearly knew what you were doing, you were trying to get back at him. There was none of that at any point in the incident.

Q: You mentioned the serious stuff a moment ago, is this the right track to take? Is the league on the right track as far as deterrents? Were you thinking, on the ice, if you were about to get suspended?

"No you don't think about that. It just happens. I know I don't.

Q: Do you think the league has an effective policy about cracking down on hits to the head?

"I think that they need to find a way to have the same standards for everyone."

(Transcription courtesy of the Flyers)


Blogger Simon said...

unbelieveable. I firmly believe that it was a 3 game ban because of tjhe 3rd game being against the Isles. Colin Campbell doesn't want an excalating situation. Like you said anthony, it would make for good hockey. when players police themselves it becomes a good game.
when players aren't able to is when frustration amounts and it becomes a powder keg. Even WITH Briere not playing, expect to see fireworks between OTHER players.

this new protecting players stuff is becoming a joke. Danny is right, there needs to be standards. zero tolerance will turn this game into a figure skate with sticks.

November 2, 2010 at 8:33 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this guy serious? Briere is a joke and only fooling himself with his convenient version of what happened. He cross-checked Nielsen in the mouth. His glove didn't "graze" his helmet. DiPietro never "speared" him. He threw his stick and blocker down when he went after Briere after the cross-check. A confrontation from which Briere ran away. And I seriously doubt Nielsen ever "challenged" Briere, considering that Nielsen is one of the most passive and clean players in the league.

Briere is a repeat offender. He uses his stick to settle scores instead of his hands. Three games was more than appropriate.

November 2, 2010 at 9:35 AM 
Blogger Simon said...

anonymous guy..

were you watching the correct game? did you see the storylines develop in the game? or are you just mildy retarded?

i'll go with the latter.

November 2, 2010 at 2:47 PM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home